- 40 - required to be shown on the tax return. If the books and records are not adequate to establish the amounts of deductions or credits, but we are persuaded that petitioner is entitled to deduct more than respondent allowed, then we are required to make some estimate of how much more should be allowed, “bearing heavily if * * * [we choose] upon the taxpayer whose inexactitude is of his own making.” Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d at 543- 544. Respondent allows or concedes $15,517 ($5,517 allowed in the notice of deficiency; $10,000 conceded at trial) of the claimed $101,517 rent expenses deduction. The only evidence suggesting a greater deduction is the lease, which required petitioner to pay a total of $60,000 to Steve and Andy during petitioner’s fiscal 1990. Weighing against petitioner are the following: (1) Petitioner has not directed us to, and we have not found, any evidence in the record that petitioner actually made the payments that the lease required. Also, the lessors, Steve and Andy, were petitioner’s sole shareholders, and transactions between related parties are subject to close scrutiny. See Maxwell v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 107, 116 (1990), and cases cited therein. (2) Steve stated that he and Andy received the same amount of rent income from petitioner. Steve reported only $10,000 of rent income from petitioner on his 1990 tax return. (3) Steve said that the rent arrangement he and Andy had with petitioner wasPage: Previous 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011