Sharon Purcell DiLeonardo - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          By July 1, 1991, the other income beneficiaries of the Trust were           
          petitioner’s mother, Helen True Purcell, hereinafter sometimes              
          referred to as Purcell, and petitioner’s two siblings.  Purcell             
          and petitioner’s two siblings are hereinafter sometimes                     
          collectively referred to as the other beneficiaries3.  Purcell              
          was entitled to receive 50 percent of the Trust’s income.                   
          Petitioner and her two siblings were each entitled to receive               
          one-sixth of the Trust’s income.  See infra note 3.                         
               Crocker National Bank acted as trustee for the Trust until             
          May 31, 1986, when Crocker National Bank was acquired by Wells              
          Fargo Bank.  Wells Fargo Bank, hereinafter sometimes referred to            
          as the Trustee, has acted as the Trust’s Trustee since May 31,              
          1986.                                                                       
               Petitioner’s husband, Joseph DiLeonardo, hereinafter                   
          sometimes referred to as DiLeonardo, is licensed by California as           
          both an attorney and a real estate broker.                                  
          The Third Account and the Objections                                        
               On July 5, 1991, the Trustee filed with the Superior Court             
          of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles                    
          (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the California Court), its            


          3    There also was a lifetime annuitant, who was entitled to               
          receive $100 per month.  This annuitant did not play a role in              
          the proceedings described infra; her interest was sufficiently              
          insignificant so that we join the parties in ignoring it for                
          purposes of analyzing the parties’ dispute in the instant case.             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011