Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon - Page 3



                                        - 3 -                                         
          Background3                                                                 
          These consolidated cases are part of a group of more than                   
          1,300 remaining cases--more than 500 cases have settled--arising            
          from respondent's disallowance of interest deductions claimed by            
          participants in various tax shelter programs promoted by Henry              
          F.K. Kersting (Mr. Kersting) during the late 1970's through the             
          1980's.  In 1989, by agreement of the parties and the Court, the            
          merits of the Kersting programs were litigated in a consolidated            
          trial of 14 docketed cases of eight petitioners that had been               
          designated as "test cases".  At trial, six of the test case                 
          petitioners were represented by Mr. Izen, test case petitioner              
          John R. Thompson was represented by Luis C. DeCastro (Mr.                   
          DeCastro), and test case petitioner John R. Cravens appeared pro            
          se.  The taxpayers in most of the remaining Kersting project                
          cases signed stipulations to be bound in which they agreed that             
          their cases would be resolved in accordance with the Court's                
          opinion in the test cases.                                                  
               Following the trial of the test cases, the Court issued its            
          opinion sustaining virtually all of respondent's determinations             
          in each of the test cases, and entered decisions against the test           
          case petitioners in accordance with its opinion.  See Dixon v.              
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-614 (Dixon II).4  Shortly                     


          3  The complete background of the these cases is set forth                  
          in Dixon III and will not be repeated here.                                 
          4  Prior to the trial of the test cases, the Court had                      
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011