Harold L. & Lacheer A. Dozier - Page 2




                                         - 2 -                                        
               After a concession by respondent that petitioners are not              
          liable for the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for           
          1995, we must decide whether petitioners are entitled to deduct             
          claimed Schedule C expenses of $26,860 and $4,800 in 1995 and               
          1996, respectively.                                                         
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          Petitioners resided in Decatur, Georgia, at the time the petition           
          was filed.                                                                  
               Petitioner Harold L. Dozier was a welder, and petitioner               
          LaCheer A. Dozier was a laundry worker.  For 1995, on a Schedule            
          C listing Public Pay Telephone/Long Distance Services as the                
          principal business, petitioners claimed a loss of $24,500.  On              
          that Schedule C, petitioners claimed total deductions of $26,860            
          as follows: commissions and fees - $17,500, legal and                       
          professional services - $650, office expenses - $4,200, rent or             
          lease: vehicles, machinery and equipment - $4,200, supplies -               
          $310.  For 1996, on a Schedule C listing Long Distance/                     
          Information Services as the principal business, petitioners                 
          reported a gain of $8,386.  On that Schedule C, petitioners                 
          claimed a deduction of $4,800 for rent or lease: vehicles,                  
          machinery and equipment.  Respondent disallowed the Schedule C              
          deductions of $26,860 for 1995 and $4,800 for 1996 on the grounds           
          that it was not established that any of the amounts claimed were            
          for ordinary and necessary business expenses or were expended for           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011