Harold L. & Lacheer A. Dozier - Page 5




                                         - 5 -                                        
          of a witness if we find it to be unworthy of belief.  Tokarski v.           
          Commissioner, 87 T.C. 74, 77 (1986).  We decide whether a witness           
          is credible based on objective facts, the reasonableness of the             
          testimony, and the demeanor of the witness.  Quock Ting v. United           
          States, 140 U.S. 417, 420-421 (1891); Wood v. Commissioner, 338             
          F.2d 602, 605 (9th Cir. 1964), affg. 41 T.C. 593 (1964).                    
               Mr. Tyler may have been attempting to support the tax                  
          returns he prepared.  He did not do so.  There was nothing in the           
          documents detailing the wire transfers which tied them to                   
          petitioners.  Mr. Tyler had no written records of his own to                
          prove he held funds in trust for petitioners or that moneys                 
          flowed in and out of the purported trust account.  We found the             
          statements of Mr. Tyler to be unreasonable and not consistent               
          with normal business practices.  We observed Mr. Tyler’s demeanor           
          and did not find him credible.                                              
               Petitioners offered no business records, checks, or receipts           
          to prove that the sums claimed as deductions were actually spent            
          and no documentary evidence to substantiate that any claimed                
          expenditures were for a business purpose.  In sum, petitioners              
          failed to substantiate the deductions in issue.  We have no                 













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011