- 11 - evidence supports the conclusion that petitioners acted reasonably under the circumstances. In contrast to many of the cases decided by this Court involving tax shelters in which the impropriety of partnership deductions could be discerned only by an investigation of the partnership’s actual operations, the problem with Utah Jojoba I Research was apparent from the documents included in the offering prepared by CFS. Both the R&D agreement and the licensing agreement were included in the offering. An experienced attorney capable of reading and understanding these documents should have understood the legal ramification of the licensing agreement canceling the R&D agreement. With the concurrent execution of the two agreements, the partnership was not engaging, even indirectly, in any research or experimentation. Instead, the partnership was merely a passive investor seeking royalty returns pursuant to the licensing agreement. Rather than seeking professional legal and tax advice,4 petitioners relied solely on their reading of the offering, their discussions with Mr. Jones, who was selling the investment, their discussion with someone from CFS, which was promoting the investment, and petitioner’s reading about jojoba. The record 4 Petitioner testified that he discussed the investment with his accountant “at least after the investment was made”. He did not indicate, however, what information he shared with the accountant or the exact nature of any advice he received.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011