Estate of Fred O. Godley, Deceased, Fred D. Godley, Administrator CTA - Page 27




                                        - 27 -                                          
          reversionary value.  He first calculated the reversionary value,              
          using the reversionary capitalization rate.  He then subtracted               
          costs of sale, then added this result to the cash-flow figure for             
          year 4.  He then discounted to present value the cash-flow figure             
          for each of 4 years following the date of valuation, using the                
          discount rate.                                                                
               Dvorak applied different discount and capitalization rates               
          depending on whether he was assuming the existence of HUD                     
          subsidies.  For Charlotte, the discount rate without the HUD                  
          subsidies was 13 percent, and with the HUD subsidies was 15                   
          percent.  The capitalization rate for the reversionary interest               
          was 11 percent without, and 12 percent with, HUD subsidies.  For              
          Monroe, the discount rate was 13 percent without, and 14 percent              
          with, the HUD subsidies.  The capitalization rate for the                     
          reversionary interest was 11.25 percent without, and 11.75                    
          percent with, HUD subsidies.  He used higher rates for the HUD-               
          subsidized housing because he believed an investor would demand a             
          greater rate of return due to the risk of losing the HUD                      
          subsidies.                                                                    
               Rather than attacking the specific method by which Dvorak                
          generated his discount and capitalization rates, respondent                   
          argues that the rates should match the rates of the properties                
          that Dvorak used as comparables for his market method value.  In              
          other words, respondent looks at the market comparables, examines             
          their rates of return, and criticizes Dvorak’s income method                  




Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011