Yancy D. Greer and Rita K. Greer - Page 4




                                         - 4 -                                           
          labeled “Payment for:  Satisfaction of Judgment” and, by                       
          numerical coding reflected on the check, the $195,477 was                      
          allocated by the State's Insurance $70,000 to medical expenses                 
          and $125,477 to interest.                                                      
               The total amount petitioner received from both the Doctor's               
          Insurance and the State's Insurance was $320,880 ($125,403 plus                
          $195,477 equals $320,880).                                                     
               On February 21, 1993, petitioner signed an agreement (the                 
          Agreement) which, in exchange for payment of the $125,403 from                 
          the Doctor's Insurance, released petitioner's doctor and the                   
          Doctor's Insurance from any further liability with respect to the              
          medical treatment petitioner received relating to bacterial                    
          endocarditis.                                                                  
               In approximately February of 1993, a document entitled                    
          “Satisfaction of Judgment” (the Satisfaction of Judgment                       
          document) was signed by petitioner's lawyers in which it was                   
          represented that by payment of the $125,403 petitioner's doctor                
          and the Doctor's Insurance satisfied their portion of the above                
          court judgment and that by payment of the $195,477 the State's                 
          Insurance satisfied its portion of the court judgment, except for              
          petitioner's future medical costs.                                             
               For 1993, petitioners timely filed a joint Federal income                 
          tax return on which petitioners excluded from reported gross                   








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011