Donald B. Hawksley - Page 22




                                       - 22 -                                         
          B. Petitioner’s Second Contention                                           
               Second, petitioner contends that respondent seized                     
          petitioner’s tax records when Mr. Amigron was arrested and then             
          lost some of those records, thereby depriving petitioner of the             
          opportunity of defending himself against respondent’s deficiency            
          determinations.                                                             
               The evidentiary record does not conclusively establish that            
          petitioner’s tax records were seized when Mr. Amigron was                   
          arrested.  However, respondent does not contest the allegation,             
          and the evidentiary record does establish that respondent mailed            
          a box to petitioner, which box (petitioner alleges) contained his           
          tax records.  We shall therefore proceed on the basis that                  
          petitioner’s tax records were seized when Mr. Amigron was                   
          arrested in May 1991.                                                       
               We do not regard the seizure of records in conjunction with            
          an arrest pursuant to a grand jury felony indictment to be a                
          ministerial act within the meaning of section 301.6404-2T(b)(1),            
          Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 52 Fed. Reg. 30163 (Aug. 13,              
          1987).  See Taylor v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 206 (1999).                    
          Petitioner does not appear to contend to the contrary; rather, he           
          alleges that respondent’s agents who executed the arrest warrant            
          failed to inventory what was seized and “they did not give me               
          notice on that.”  However, these allegations are unsupported in             
          the record.  Thus, there is no evidence, other than petitioner’s            






Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011