Estate of Ethel Josephine Spowart Hinz - Page 34




                                       - 34 -                                         
          descriptions, we arrive at an average of about $500,000 per lot,            
          the amount that Hulberg used.                                               
               The Quito Property is in the Campbell Union School District            
          and not the Saratoga School District.  Atkinson and Hulberg agree           
          that homes in the Saratoga School District command a market                 
          premium compared to homes in the Campbell Union School District.            
          Accordingly, if any of the comparables are in the Saratoga School           
          District, then their sale prices should be adjusted downward.               
          However, we have not found, and petitioner has not directed our             
          attention to, anything in the record that shows that any of the             
          Hulberg’s comparables were in the Saratoga School District or in            
          any other school district where residential property prices were            
          higher than the Campbell Union School District.  Neither side has           
          presented to the Court cogent reasons why the Court should                  
          disregard any of the comparable properties presented by Atkinson            
          or by Hulberg.                                                              
               We note that two of the comparable properties appear on both           
          Atkinson’s and Hulberg’s lists–-the property at 15425 Monte Vista           
          Dr., which was sold in May 1992 for $675,000, and the 1.16-acre             
          property at lot 16, Sobey Oaks Court, which was sold in July 1991           
          for $550,000.  We note further that Atkinson shows the Monte                
          Vista Dr. property as being 2.9 acres, Hulberg shows this Monte             
          Vista Dr. property as being 2.0 acres.  Neither side pointed out            
          the discrepancy at trial or on brief, and neither expert witness’           






Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011