Nancy J. Hukkanen-Campbell - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         

          amount of any damages received (whether by suit or agreement and            
          whether as lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of                 
          personal injuries or sickness”.  The regulations provide that               
               The term “damages received (whether by suit or                         
               agreement)” means an amount received (other than                       
               workmen’s compensation) through prosecution of a legal                 
               suit or action based upon tort or tort type rights, or                 
               through a settlement agreement entered into in lieu of                 
               such prosecution.                                                      
          Sec. 1.104-1(c), Income Tax Regs.  Thus, damages may be excluded            
          from gross income only if petitioner shows that (1) the                     
          underlying cause of action giving rise to the recovery is based             
          upon tort or tort type rights, and (2) the damages were received            
          on account of personal injuries or sickness.  See Commissioner v.           
          Schleier, supra at 336-337; Wesson v. United States, 48 F.3d 894,           
          901-902 (5th Cir. 1995); Bagley v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 396,              
          416 (1995), affd. 121 F.3d 393 (8th Cir. 1997).                             
               When damages are received pursuant to a suit or settlement             
          agreement, the nature of the underlying claim determines whether            
          such damages are excludable under section 104(a)(2).  See United            
          States v. Burke, 504 U.S. 229 (1992); Thompson v. Commissioner,             
          866 F.2d 709, 711 (4th Cir. 1989), affg. 89 T.C. 632 (1987);                
          Robinson v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 116, 126 (1994), affd. in                
          part, revd. in part, and remanded on another ground 70 F.3d 34              
          (5th Cir. 1995).  Determining the nature of the claim is a                  
          factual inquiry.  See Bagley v. Commissioner, supra at 406;                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011