Mary T. King and Fatai O. King - Page 11




                                        - 11 -                                          
             of the alleged expenditures as required by section                         
             274(d)(1).                                                                 
                  In their amended return, petitioners claim insurance                  
             expenses in the aggregate amount of $1,000.  At trial,                     
             petitioners introduced copies of four checks totaling                      
             $593.70.  Three of those checks in the aggregate amount of                 
             $382.70 were payable to Flagship Insurance Co.  Petitioner                 
             testified that those checks were for insurance on                          
             petitioners’ newsstands but petitioner also acknowledged                   
             that he maintained homeowner’s insurance on his residence.                 
             There is nothing in the record, other than petitioner’s                    
             vague testimony, to show that the subject expenditures in                  
             the aggregate amount of $382.70 were for insurance on the                  
             newsstands.  Petitioners introduced no documents to                        
             corroborate Mr. King’s testimony, such as invoices or                      
             insurance polices.  Accordingly, we agree with respondent                  
             that the expenditures reflected by the three checks in the                 
             aggregate amount of $382.70 are not deductible.  The fourth                
             check in the amount of $211 is payable to Pennsylvania Auto                
             Insurance Plan.  The expenditure reflected by this check                   
             appears to be for insurance on petitioners’ automobile.  It                
             is not an allowable expense because petitioners have                       
             provided no way to allocate the expenditure between their                  
             personal and business use of the automobile, and, thus,                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011