Mary T. King and Fatai O. King - Page 17




                                        - 17 -                                          
             electricity, and $426.23 for payments to Bell of                           
             Pennsylvania for telephone expenses.                                       
                  Petitioners claim a deduction in the amount $4,609.09                 
             for payments allegedly made to independent contractors.                    
             Petitioners rely on 11 checks to substantiate that                         
             deduction.  The following is a list of the check number,                   
             date, payee, amount, and notation taken from the checks:                   

             Check No.       Date           Payee  Amount       Notation                
             2030      03/08/93 William H. Randleman$500.00  711 Employee for 5+3 days     
             2032      05/06/93 Randy L. Baptist 300.00   5 day pay employee            
             1004      05/11/93 John Ebatebeye   146.69   Wk 1 -at Knox                 
             2035      06/02/93 John Ebatebeye   275.67   Week 22-23 5/18-6/1/93        
             2037      06/14/93 John Ebatebeye   507.24   Wk 22/23                      
             2038      06/29/93 John Ebatebeye   437.05   Week                          
             2039      07/22/93 John Ebatebeye   900.82   Wk 26, 27 & 28                
             2051      08/02/93 Veresta B. Hyman 500.00   #15155 (*$1)                  
             2052      08/02/93 Florence Young   250.00   #11555 (4 days)               
             7330      08/07/93 John Ebatebeye   686.62   two at Knox lottery           
             2062      11/30/93 John Ebatebeye   105.00   5 pk of Instant Tickets       
                                                 4,609.09                               

                  Petitioner’s testimony concerning the above-alleged                   
             payments to independent contractors is vague, contradic-                   
             tory, and unworthy of belief.  For example, in the case                    
             of payments made to Messrs. Randleman and Baptist,                         
             Ms. Hyman, and Ms. Young, there is evidence that those                     
             individuals were lottery winners and that the above checks                 
             drawn to their order are payments of their winnings, and                   
             not for services operating a newsstand.                                    
                  Similarly, we cannot determine the nature of the                      
             payments allegedly made to Mr. John Ebatebeye.  According                  
             to petitioner’s testimony, Mr. Ebatebeye purchased the                     





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011