- 2 - The Court agrees with and adopts the opinion of the Special Trial Judge, which is set forth below. OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE WOLFE, Special Trial Judge: This matter is before the Court on petitioners’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition. Because of concessions and agreements made by the parties,1 the sole issue remaining for decision is whether petitioners are entitled to the benefits of a settlement offer that was made available to other taxpayers who had partnership interests in SAB Resource Recovery Associates, a part of the Plastics Recycling 1 Petitioners concede that they are not entitled to any deductions, losses, investment credits, business energy investment credits, or any other tax benefits claimed on their 1981 Federal income tax return as a result of their participation in SAB Resource Recovery Associates (SAB). Petitioners also concede that they are not entitled to any investment tax credit carrybacks to the years 1978 and 1979 that resulted from their participation in SAB. Petitioners also concede that the resulting underpayments in income tax are substantial underpayments attributable to tax-motivated transactions, subject to the increased rate of interest established under sec. 6621(c). Petitioners stipulate that they are liable for an addition to tax under sec. 6659 for valuation overstatement for 1981 of $17,253. Petitioners also concede that the assessment period for 1981 with regard to the amount of any deficiency that resulted from any adjustment to items from SAB was extended pursuant to sec. 6501(c)(4). Petitioners further concede that to the extent the notices of deficiency for 1978 and 1979 relate to investment tax carrybacks from the year 1981 arising from petitioners’ participation in SAB, any assessments and collection of any deficiencies arising from the disallowance of such credits are not barred by the statute of limitations pursuant to sec. 6501(j). By stipulation, respondent concedes that petitioners are not required to include in their 1978 gross income $42,935 as a recovery of income. Respondent also concedes that petitioners are not subject to an addition to tax under sec. 6651(a)(1) for 1978.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011