Michael A. Lacher and Judith W. Lacher - Page 2




                                         - 2 -                                          
          The Court agrees with and adopts the opinion of the Special Trial             
          Judge, which is set forth below.                                              
                          OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE                            
               WOLFE, Special Trial Judge:  This matter is before the Court             
          on petitioners’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition.                    
          Because of concessions and agreements made by the parties,1 the               
          sole issue remaining for decision is whether petitioners are                  
          entitled to the benefits of a settlement offer that was made                  
          available to other taxpayers who had partnership interests in SAB             
          Resource Recovery Associates, a part of the Plastics Recycling                


          1    Petitioners concede that they are not entitled to any                    
          deductions, losses, investment credits, business energy                       
          investment credits, or any other tax benefits claimed on their                
          1981 Federal income tax return as a result of their participation             
          in SAB Resource Recovery Associates (SAB).  Petitioners also                  
          concede that they are not entitled to any investment tax credit               
          carrybacks to the years 1978 and 1979 that resulted from their                
          participation in SAB.  Petitioners also concede that the                      
          resulting underpayments in income tax are substantial                         
          underpayments attributable to tax-motivated transactions, subject             
          to the increased rate of interest established under sec. 6621(c).             
          Petitioners stipulate that they are liable for an addition to tax             
          under sec. 6659 for valuation overstatement for 1981 of $17,253.              
          Petitioners also concede that the assessment period for 1981 with             
          regard to the amount of any deficiency that resulted from any                 
          adjustment to items from SAB was extended pursuant to sec.                    
          6501(c)(4).  Petitioners further concede that to the extent the               
          notices of deficiency for 1978 and 1979 relate to investment tax              
          carrybacks from the year 1981 arising from petitioners’                       
          participation in SAB, any assessments and collection of any                   
          deficiencies arising from the disallowance of such credits are                
          not barred by the statute of limitations pursuant to sec.                     
          6501(j).  By stipulation, respondent concedes that petitioners                
          are not required to include in their 1978 gross income $42,935 as             
          a recovery of income.  Respondent also concedes that petitioners              
          are not subject to an addition to tax under sec. 6651(a)(1) for               
          1978.                                                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011