- 2 - (petitioner) made to his former wife. We hold they may not. Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code as applicable to the subject year. Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Background All facts were either stipulated or found by the Court from exhibits accompanying the stipulations of fact. The stipulations of fact and the accompanying exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference, and the parties’ stipulations of fact are found accordingly. Petitioners are cash method taxpayers who resided in La Grange Park, Illinois, when we filed their petition commencing this action. They filed with respondent a joint 1993 Federal income tax return on which they claimed a $47,900 deduction for alimony paid to petitioner’s former spouse, Linda R. Maloney (Ms. Maloney). Ms. Maloney sued petitioner for divorce in a Virginia circuit court, and, on March 21, 1991, the court finalized the divorce by way of a decree of final divorce (Virginia decree). The Virginia decree provides in relevant part as follows: THIS CAUSE came on this day to be heard upon the bill of complaint; upon process served upon the defendant; upon the answer and cross-bill of the defendant; upon the report of James A. Evans, Commissioner in Chancery, and the matter was argued by counsel. UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, the Court finds from the report, independently of the admissions of thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011