- 7 - On brief, petitioners request that they either be permitted to elect the limitation provisions of section 86(e) for the lump- sum benefits paid in 1996 or that they be permitted to refund the amounts actually paid to them by the Social Security Administration. The election provisions of section 86(e), even if petitioners were able to perfect such an election, would do nothing to limit petitioners’ tax liability. Respondent’s determination of the deficiency in petitioners’ 1996 tax year resulted from the inclusion of only $12,932 of Social Security benefits, which are the benefits reported as attributable to 1996. Petitioners’ alternative request likewise affords them no relief. Taxpayers reporting income on the cash method of accounting, such as petitioners, must include an item in income for the taxable year in which the item is actually or constructively received. See sec. 451(a). Petitioners may not retroactively erase the receipt of income in 1996 and 1997 by refunding it in a subsequent tax year. See Simon v. Commissioner, 11 T.C. 227, 231-232 (1948); see also Commissioner v. Gaddy, 344 F.2d. 460 (5th Cir. 1965), affg. in part and remanding in part 38 T.C. 943 (1962); Florida Progress Corp. & Subs. v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 587, 598 (2000)(discussing claim of right doctrine). We thus confine our consideration of petitioners’ tax liability to the specific facts presented.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011