- 18 -
to pay costs pursuant to section 6673(a)(2). Rather, the Court
ordered that compliance with such orders (the orders to show
cause) be extended to August 25, 2000, at which time, petitioners
and Ms. Sluyter were to show cause, in writing, why the orders to
show cause should not be made absolute.
The Court denied the motions to quash on the grounds that no
trial was held and the subpoenas were no longer in force. The
Court denied the sanctions portion of the motions to compel.
The Court continued the consolidated cases and retained
jurisdiction.
Subsequent Actions by Parties
On June 7, 2000, respondent, by separate motion in each
case, moved for partial summary judgment as to the section
6662(a) penalty (the motions for partial summary judgment or
motions). No petitioner responded to any of the motions for
partial summary judgment.
Neither petitioners nor Ms. Sluyter has filed any response
to the orders to show cause.
Respondent has filed various memoranda of points and
authorities in support of the motions for judgment on the
pleadings and partial summary judgment and the orders to show
cause, as well as the affidavit of Paul K. Webb, one of
respondent’s attorneys, in connection with the order to show
cause as to Ms. Sluyter.
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011