Jacob and Chana Pinson, et al. - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         
          selling expenses.  Letters from the Israeli administration state            
          that “Flocktex did not pay dividends to shareholders * * * but              
          instead paid a special commission.”                                         
              We further observe that petitioners raised in their post-              
          trial briefing the alternative contention that even if the                  
          payments from FIL were considered compensation, they were                   
          nonetheless foreign source income.  Since identifying the amounts           
          as general limitation income would appear to be equally                     
          consistent with this scenario, we find the Forms 1116 reveal                
          little about the transactions at issue.  A Form 1116                        
          categorization potentially supportive of multiple                           
          characterizations does not outweigh the balance of the record.              
               Hence, whatever can be inferred from petitioners’ Forms                
          1116, we simply see no honest and consistent respect for the                
          alleged substance in either reporting or other representations              
          and actions that would justify a result different from that                 
          reached in our memorandum opinion.                                          
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                             Appropriate orders will be               
                                        issued granting petitioners’                  
                                        motions to amend, petitioners’                
                                        motion for reconsideration, and               
                                        respondent’s motion for                       
                                        reconsideration.                              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  

Last modified: May 25, 2011