Frances L. and Gary L. Rambacher - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          protecting litigants from the burden of relitigating an identical           
          issue and of promoting judicial economy by preventing unnecessary           
          or redundant litigation."  Meier v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 273,              
          282 (1988).                                                                 
               In Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 155 (1979), the             
          Supreme Court established the following three-prong test for                
          applying collateral estoppel:  (1) The issue presented in the               
          subsequent litigation is in substance the same as the issue                 
          presented in the first case; (2) the controlling facts or legal             
          principles have not changed significantly since the first                   
          judgment; and (3) special circumstances do not warrant an                   
          exception to the normal rules of preclusion.                                
               Building on the Supreme Court's analysis in Montana, this              
          Court has identified five criteria that must be satisfied for               
          collateral estoppel to apply.  They are: (1) The issue in the               
          second suit must be identical in all respects with the one                  
          decided in the first suit; (2) there must be a final judgment               
          rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction; (3) collateral               
          estoppel may only be invoked against parties and their privies to           
          the prior judgment; (4) the parties must have actually litigated            
          the issue and the resolution of the issue must have been                    
          essential to the prior decision; and (5) the controlling facts              
          and applicable legal rules must remain unchanged from those in              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011