Estate of Charles E. Reichardt - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         
          any funds to the other as a result of the adjusting entries.8               
          After-the-fact paperwork by decedent’s C.P.A. does not refute               
          that decedent and his children had agreed that decedent could               
          continue to use and control the property during his life.                   
                    d.   Conclusion                                                   
               We conclude that decedent and his children had an implied              
          agreement that decedent could continue to possess and enjoy the             
          assets and retain the right to the income from the assets that he           
          conveyed to the partnership during his lifetime.                            
               2.   Whether Decedent Transferred Property to the                      
                    Partnership in a Bona Fide Sale for Full and Adequate             
                    Consideration                                                     
               Section 2036(a) does not apply if the transfer of property             
          was part of a bona fide sale in exchange for full and adequate              
          consideration.  A bona fide sale is an arm’s-length business                
          transaction between a willing buyer and a willing seller.  See              
          Wheeler v. United States, 77 AFTR 2d 96-1405, 96-1411, 96-1 USTC            
          par. 60,226 (W.D. Tex. 1996) (value of homestead is included in             
          decedent’s gross estate under section 2036(a) in part because               
          there was no bona fide sale among family members).                          


               8  Petitioner did not establish the accuracy of the records            
          that Hannah’s firm used to prepare the adjusting entries.  The              
          parties stipulated that the adjusting entries summarized other              
          underlying records but not that the underlying records are                  
          accurate or complete.  Petitioner does not identify all of the              
          records on which the summary was based.  One of the underlying              
          records that petitioner produced is another summary that is                 
          extremely vague, e.g., $8,116 “Various C.E. Reichardt”.                     
          Petitioner’s reliance on the adjusting entries is misplaced.                





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011