Charles and Beatrice M. Reynolds - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         

          D.   Car and Truck Expenses                                                 
               Petitioners owned three automobiles in 1993 including a 1992           
          Lexus, a 1989 Chevrolet, and a 1988 Toyota Camry.  The Lexus was            
          used exclusively, or nearly so, by Mrs. Reynolds.  The Chevrolet            
          was used exclusively for personal transportation.  In October of            
          1994 petitioners traded the Chevrolet, along with cash, for a               
          Ford van.  Petitioner testified that he used the Toyota Camry in            
          his law practice and to travel to and from his farm and his                 
          various rental properties.                                                  
               Petitioner did not maintain a log for his business                     
          automobile mileage.  During his testimony petitioner presented              
          documents that were reconstructions of his business mileage.  The           
          reconstructions were created as a result of the examination of              
          his Federal income tax returns.                                             
               As a preliminary step in his reconstructions, petitioner               
          determined the ratio of business mileage to nonbusiness mileage             
          for computing depreciation deducted on Schedule C.  Included in             
          total reconstructed business miles is employee business mileage             
          for which he was compensated by the IRS.  Also included in total            
          business mileage is mileage accumulated commuting to and from his           
          home and the Cook County courthouse to do research and “back and            
          forth to the title company” for real estate closings.                       
               Respondent determined that petitioner has not substantiated            
          his business use of the Toyota Camry.                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011