Charles and Beatrice M. Reynolds - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         

          parties have stipulated an exhibit that they have represented to            
          be a copy of petitioners’ joint Federal income tax return for the           
          year 1993.3  As part of the stipulation the parties agree that              
          “all exhibits referred to herein and attached hereto may be                 
          accepted as authentic”.  In addition, the Court has admitted into           
          evidence, upon motion after trial, a certified copy of                      
          petitioners’ joint Federal income tax return for 1994.                      
         Issue 3.  Medical Expenses                                                   
              Under section 213, individuals are allowed to deduct the                
         expenses paid for the “medical care” of the taxpayer, the                    
         taxpayer’s spouse, or a dependent, to the extent the expenses                
         exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income and are not                      
         compensated for by insurance or otherwise.                                   
              The term “medical care” includes amounts paid for the                   
         diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease,            
         or for insurance covering the diagnosis, cure, mitigation,                   
         treatment, or prevention of disease.                                         
              Petitioners claimed medical and dental expenses totaling                
         $13,644 for 1993.  They did not deduct any medical expenses for              
         1994.  Respondent denied the deductions, determining that Mrs.               
         Maxey was not petitioners’ dependent and that medical expenses had           


          3    Under our Rules “A stipulation shall be treated * * * as a             
          conclusive admission by the parties to the stipulation”.  Rule              
          91(e); see, e.g., Noneman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1978-283.             





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011