Rhone Poulenc Surfactants and Specialties, L.P. - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          I.  Introduction                                                            
               Petitioner is a Delaware corporation with its principal                
          place of business in Wayne, New Jersey.  Rhone-Poulenc                      
          Surfactants and Specialties, L.P., is a Delaware limited                    
          partnership.5  Petitioner is a partner in the partnership other             
          than the tax matters partner.  By notice of final partnership               
          administrative adjustment dated September 12, 1997 (the FPAA),              
          respondent proposed adjustments with respect to the partnership             
          for its 1990 taxable (calendar) year.  The parties have presented           
          us with questions of law that, were we to answer them as                    
          petitioner requests, would leave us without any genuine issue of            
          fact.  However, we do not answer those questions as petitioner              
          requests.  We are left with a genuine issue of fact.  Therefore,            
          summary disposition is inappropriate.  See Rule 121(b).6                    
          II.  Discussion                                                             
               A.  Respondent’s Adjustments                                           
               Respondent has not adjusted any item of income, loss,                  
          deduction, or credit of the partnership, but he has challenged              
          the partnership’s treatment of a certain transfer of property.              


               5For convenience, we use the terms “partnership” and                   
          “partner” without deciding whether a partnership existed or                 
          petitioner was a partner in that partnership, conclusions that              
          respondent disputes.                                                        
               6Petitioner has requested a hearing on the motion.  The                
          parties’ submissions fully set forth their respective positions,            
          and we see no need for any further argument.  Therefore, we have            
          not granted petitioner’s request for a hearing.                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011