Rhone Poulenc Surfactants and Specialties, L.P. - Page 59




                                        - 59 -                                        
               Before TEFRA, adjustments with respect to partnership                  
               items were made to each partner's income tax return at                 
               the time (and if) that return was examined.  * * * The                 
               tax writing committees explained the TEFRA partnership                 
               provisions as follows:  "[T]he tax treatment of items                  
               of partnership income, loss, deductions, and credits                   
               will be determined at the partnership level in a                       
               unified partnership proceeding rather than in separate                 
               proceedings with the partners."  * * * Thus, section                   
               6221 provides for the determination of all partnership                 
               items at the partnership level rather than at the                      
               partner level.  [Majority op. pp. 11-12; citations                     
               omitted.]                                                              
               Despite its acknowledgment of the purpose of the TEFRA                 
          partnership rules, the majority holds that if the partner's                 
          personal limitations period has not expired, then the                       
          partnership's limitations period is irrelevant with respect to              
          that partner so that the Commissioner may make a partnership-               
          level determination of a partnership item, which would apply to             
          only the partner with the unexpired personal limitations period.            
          This result is contrary to the statutory scheme and frustrates              
          the TEFRA goal to minimize inconsistent treatment of partners.              
               In addition to providing inconsistent treatment of                     
          partnership items, the majority's holding will complicate the               
          administration of the TEFRA statutes because it will cause                  
          nonpartnership items to be adjudicated in TEFRA partnership-level           
          proceedings, which result is inconsistent with TEFRA policy.5               


               5The separate treatment of partnership and nonpartnership              
          items in partnership proceedings is integral to the statutory               
          framework of TEFRA and reflects the intent of Congress.  For                
          instance,                                                                   
                                                              (continued...)          





Page:  Previous  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011