- 19 - classified and reported as separate items in the balance sheet. [Weygandt et al., Accounting Principles 324 (3d ed. 1993); emphasis added.] See also Gehl Co. v. Commissioner, 795 F.2d 1324, 1330 (7th Cir. 1986) (“The term accounts receivable normally refers to an amount that is due in return for goods or services supplied.” (Emphasis added.)), affg. in part and setting aside in part on another ground T.C. Memo. 1984-667. The record does not show whether Sack intended the term “accounts receivable” in the acquisition agreement to encompass all accounts which are broadly classified as receivables or to be limited to its more common application of a trade receivable. Petitioner’s testimony that York acquired all of Mid- Nebraska’s assets was premised solely on his own understanding of the transaction. However, he had absolutely no control over what assets York wanted and acquired. There is no evidence that either Sack or his son specifically identified which of Mid- Nebraska’s assets York wanted to acquire when they drafted the letter of intent or the acquisition agreement. Petitioner’s ignorance of financial and accounting concepts renders his testimony alone insufficient to establish that York procured the loans to shareholder accounts when it acquired Mid-Nebraska’s business, and the documents on which petitioners rely are inconclusive.Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011