J.C. Shepherd - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
         other partners.  The partnership agreement states that the effect            
         of the withdrawal is to terminate the relationship of the                    
         withdrawing partner as a partner and thereby eliminate the                   
         withdrawing partner’s right to liquidate the partnership.  The               
         withdrawing partner may transfer all or any part of his                      
         partnership interest with or without consideration, but only                 
         after providing the other partners the first option to purchase              
         his interest at fair market value, generally as determined by an             
         independent appraiser.                                                       
              Upon dissolution of the partnership, proceeds from the                  
         liquidation of partnership property, after satisfaction of                   
         partnership debts, are to be applied to payment of credit                    
         balances of the partners’ capital accounts.                                  
         Transfer of the Leased Land to the Partnership                               
              On August 1, 1991–-one day before John and William had                  
         executed the partnership agreement--petitioner and his wife                  
         executed two deeds purporting to transfer the leased land to the             
         partnership.6  Each deed purported to transfer to the partnership            
         an undivided 50-percent interest in the leased land (for an                  
         aggregate transfer of the entire interest in the leased land).               
         On August 30, 1991, the deeds conveying the leased land to the               
         partnership were recorded.                                                   


               6 Again, as far as is revealed in the record, petitioner’s             
          wife owned no record title or interest in the leased land but               
          signed the deeds as a formality to eliminate any question as to             
          spousal benefits under Alabama law.                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011