Harland and Shirley Stonecipher - Page 5




                                         -5-                                          
          related to raising cattle, at a cost to petitioners, where                  
          indicated in the record, as follows:                                        
                    Improvement                 Cost                                  
                    Barn                     $40,000                                  
                    Cabin                    40,000                                   
                    2-1/4 mile fence           30,000                                 
                    3 ponds                  --                                       
                   Horse/cattle shed        --                                       
               During 1993, 1994, and 1995, petitioners’ property was also            
          the site of a tenant house and a mobile home, occupied for a                
          period by petitioners’ son.                                                 
               Petitioners may be regarded as first-generation cattle                 
          ranchers in the sense that they did not receive or inherit any              
          cattle from their parents.  Instead, petitioners had to purchase            
          their initial head of cattle.  From 1982 through 1992 or 1993,              
          petitioners sold the cattle that they raised each year, including           
          all the male and female calves.  After market prices fell in                
          1992, petitioner began retaining most of the female calves, until           
          1998, when he began selling them again.                                     
               Petitioners’ cattle ranch may accurately be described as a             
          no-frills cattle operation.  Petitioners’ improvements to the               
          ranch property were not extravagant.  Neither petitioners nor               
          other members of petitioners’ family, some of whom also lived on            
          the property, made significant recreational use of the ranch                
          property.  There was no swimming pool, golf course, tennis court,           
          Jacuzzi, or other significant recreational amenity.  Petitioners            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011