John Charles Treadaway, Sr. - Page 11




                                       - 11 -                                         
               We shall first address petitioner’s position regarding the             
          determinations in the notice with respect to (1) the deductions             
          claimed in Schedules F of the 1994 and 1995 joint returns,                  
          (2) the amount that Ms. Treadaway received during 1994 from the             
          sale of the Brenda property, (3) the Social Security benefits               
          that Ms. Treadaway received during the years at issue, and                  
          (4) the net operating loss deductions claimed in the 1994 and               
          1995 joint returns.  As we understand petitioner’s position, the            
          property used in the horse-training activities and the income               
          therefrom, the Brenda property and the income therefrom, and the            
          Social Security benefits that Ms. Treadaway received constituted            
          the separate property of Ms. Treadaway, and not community prop-             
          erty, under the community property law of the State of Arizona.             
          Consequently, according to petitioner, he is not liable for the             

               6(...continued)                                                        
          brief certain documents that are not part of the record.  The               
          Court had those documents returned to petitioner.  We also note             
          that we have serious reservations about petitioner’s claim that             
          documentation substantiating the expenses claimed in Schedules C            
          of the 1994 and 1995 joint returns was stolen or destroyed during           
          the October 1996 burglary.  The claimed missing property listed             
          in the police reports with respect to that burglary did not                 
          include any records identified as tax records, banker boxes, or             
          steel filing cabinets in which petitioner claims he kept records            
          relating to those returns.  Moreover, even if petitioner had                
          persuaded us that documentation substantiating the expenses                 
          claimed in Schedules C of the 1994 and 1995 joint returns had               
          been stolen or destroyed during the October 1996 burglary,                  
          petitioner would have to meet his burden of proof in this case by           
          presenting credible secondary evidence.  As noted above, we are             
          unwilling to rely on petitioner’s testimony in this case to                 
          support his position that respondent’s determinations in the                
          notice are erroneous.                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011