- 6 - not show that respondent’s analysis of petitioner’s accounts for rent and other income was in error. On the basis of a bank deposits analysis for the 1993 tax year (without the designation of any specific items of income), respondent determined that petitioner had understated 1993 gross receipts by $74,046. Likewise, for the 1994 tax year, respondent used a generalized bank deposits analysis to conclude that petitioner had overreported its income by $66,737. Petitioner does not dispute the 1994 adjustment reducing its gross receipts. With respect to respondent’s 1993 bank deposits analysis, petitioner provided its own analysis in an attempt to show that its gross receipts were overreported for its 1993 taxable year. Petitioner’s analysis contained a reconciliation of its 1993 deposits to the income amount reported on its 1993 corporate return. Petitioner’s reconciliation reflected reductions from total deposits of amounts that were not includable in gross receipts, such as proceeds of loans from Merrill Lynch and other similar items. Respondent did not present any evidence regarding the methodology used in conducting the 1993 bank deposits analysis or contradicting the items petitioner explained were from nontaxable sources. Discussion Taxpayers are required to maintain adequate records of taxable income. See sec. 6001. During the examination ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011