Jasmeen Akhter - Page 5




                                        - 4 -                                         
          penalties for negligence for an underpayment equal to the entire            
          amount of the deficiency for each year in issue.                            
               The first issue for decision is whether petitioner is                  
          entitled to earned income credits.  An earned income credit is              
          allowed to an eligible taxpayer under section 32(a) in an amount            
          based upon a percentage of the taxpayer’s earned income.  Earned            
          income is defined under section 32(c)(2) to include the amount of           
          the taxpayer’s net earnings from self-employment.                           
               Respondent argues that petitioner is not entitled to the               
          earned income credit for a number of reasons.  One reason, the              
          only one we need discuss, is that petitioner had no earned income           
          during the years in issue.1  We agree with respondent.                      
          Petitioner testified that during the years in issue, she and her            
          sister were tailors, performing work in their house.  On                    
          petitioner’s tax returns for the years in issue, she reported               
          $5,723, $6,783, and $7,016 in income on Schedules C-EZ, Net                 
          Profit From Business.  No business expenses were claimed as                 
          deductions in any year.  No business name or other information              
          was provided for any of the years, aside from the notation “self            
          employed” as a description of the principal business.  In 1995              
          and 1996, the “principal business code” was not provided on the             
          form.  In 1997, however, petitioner reported the code as “2659”.            

          1Respondent argues in his memorandum filed at trial that the                
          only evidence shown to respondent that petitioner earned income             
          was a picture of petitioner at a sewing machine.                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011