- 7 - Nothing in the record indicates that any amounts were previously assessed or collected, or that any rebates were made to petitioner. Therefore, there can be no underpayments in this case because for each year in issue the tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code was zero and did not exceed the amount of tax shown on the return.3 We therefore hold that petitioner is not liable for the accuracy-related penalties determined by respondent. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered under Rule 155. 3Compare the definition of an underpayment in sec. 6664(a) with the definition of a deficiency in sec. 6211(a). While the definitions are substantially similar, the latter--in contrast to the former--treats the excess of the earned income credit claimed (or allowed) over the tax shown (or imposed) as a negative amount of tax. See sec. 6211(b)(4).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011