- 3 - liposuction to remove 12 pounds of fat from the mass. The second procedure removed the excess skin of the mass. The final procedure was conducted to remove excess fluid which had collected between the skin and the abdominal muscles. The statements submitted by the plastic surgeon who performed the surgery described the procedures as “cosmetic” in nature. The procedures were not covered by petitioner’s health insurance. Petitioner paid for the surgeries and deducted the costs as medical expenses on her 1996 Federal income tax return. Respondent determined that the expenses related to these surgical procedures were for “cosmetic surgery” of a type not considered “medical care” and therefore were not deductible under section 213. The medical deductions as claimed and as allowed are as follows: Expense Amount claimed Amount allowed Medicine & drugs $75 $75 Optical expenses 240 240 Dental expenses 150 150 Pre-tax insurance 787 -0- Doctors/hospitals 2,617 -0- Surgical expenses 7,691 -0- The “Doctors/Hospitals” and “Surgical expenses” disallowed by respondent both relate to the procedures discussed above. Although these claimed expenses total $10,308, petitioner only substantiated that she paid $7,631.28 for the disputed procedures. At trial petitioner introduced no evidence fromPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011