- 6 - does not fall within the exception for deductible cosmetic procedures. See sec. 213(d)(9)(A). We disagree. Petitioner was 100 pounds overweight and suffered from morbid obesity. Obesity is well recognized in the medical community as a serious disease. See National Heart, Lung, and Blood Inst., Natl. Inst. of Health, “Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults”, NIH Pub. No. 98-4083 (1998). Furthermore, petitioner continued to suffer from the effects of this disease in the form of the above-described skin mass that was a deformity. This mass was not merely unsightly, it was prone to infection and disease and interfered with petitioner’s daily life. The procedures that petitioner underwent meaningfully promoted the proper function of her body and treated her disease. Despite the classification given to the procedures by the surgeon, we find that these procedures are not “cosmetic surgery” for purposes of section 213. Sec. 213(d)(9)(B). Petitioner’s deduction, however, is limited to the amount of expenses that she substantiated. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: May 25, 2011