Ambase Corporation, f.k.a. The Home Group Inc. - Page 19




                                       - 19 -                                         
               basis.  Finance subsidiaries were also sanctioned by a                 
               number of published rulings.5                                          
               5 Rev. Rul. 73-110, 1973-1 C.B. 454; Rev. Rul. 72-416,                 
               1972-2 C.B. 591; Rev. Rul. 70-645, 1970-2 C.B. 273;                    
               Rev. Rul. 69-501, 1969-2 C.B. 233; Rev. Rul. 69-377,                   
               1969-2 C.B. 231.  [Id. at 9.]                                          
          The published rulings cited in the footnote were issued in                  
          connection with various issues raised by the Interest                       
          Equalization Tax, but a central conclusion in each was that                 
          indebtedness issued by a finance subsidiary in circumstances                
          similar to those just described would be treated as its own and             
          not the parent’s, provided the ratio of the subsidiary’s                    
          outstanding debt to its equity did not exceed 5 to 1.  After                
          expiration of the Interest Equalization Tax, the Commissioner in            
          Rev. Rul. 74-464, 1974-2 C.B. 46, revoked four of the foregoing             
          revenue rulings12 on the grounds that expiration of the Interest            
          Equalization Tax                                                            
               eliminated any rationale for treating finance                          
               subsidiaries any differently than other corporations                   
               with respect to their corporate validity or the                        
               validity of their corporate indebtedness.  Thus, the                   
               mere existence of a five to one debt to equity ratio,                  
               as a basis for concluding that debt obligations of a                   
               finance subsidiary constitute its own bona fide                        
               indebtedness, should no longer be relied upon.  [Id.,                  
               1974-2 C.B. at 47.]                                                    
               As further recounted in the legislative history,                       
          notwithstanding the Commissioner’s unwillingness to issue rulings           

               12 The remaining ruling, Rev. Rul. 72-416, 1972-2 C.B. 591,            
          was revoked by Rev. Rul. 74-620, 1974-2 C.B. 380, on the basis of           
          the same rationale as in Rev. Rul. 74-464, 1974-2 C.B. 46.                  





Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011