B & D Foundations, Inc. - Page 54




                                        - 54 -                                         
          current 1996 fiscal year in issue.  This higher cumulative                   
          average annual return is skewed by the much higher annual returns            
          on equity petitioner enjoyed during its early years of operation,            
          when its equity was much lower.  See, e.g. Labelgraphics, Inc. v.            
          Commissioner, 221 F.3d at 1099 (88.5-percent return on $43,482               
          equity enjoyed during the taxpayer’s first year of operation is              
          not particularly meaningful to a present investor judging return             
          on the current year’s equity in excess of $1 million).  In                   
          addition, the higher cumulative average return on equity is even             
          less significant where, as discussed previously, petitioner’s                
          past undercompensation of Mr. and Mrs. Myers, during prior years             
          of operation, to the extent not fully recovered prior to the 1996            
          fiscal year in issue, was intended to be remedied by the deferred            
          compensation agreements adopted during that year.  See also,                 
          e.g., Wagner Constr., Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-160.             
               At any rate, petitioner has failed to show that an                      
          independent-investor-return-on-equity analysis establishes that              
          the compensation in issue paid to Mr. and Mrs. Myers for its year            
          ended July 31, 1996, was reasonable.27  For that year, even before           


               27Petitioner further failed to address respondent’s argument            
          that the $77,237 advance Mr. and Mrs. Myers made to it in 1987               
          should also be included in shareholder invested capital for                  
          purposes of calculating petitioner’s annual return on equity.                
          Although petitioner did repay or distribute an amount equal to               
          the $77,237 advance to Mr. and Mrs. Myers during its first 4                 
          years of operation, petitioner provided neither a factual record             
          nor legal argument that would enable the Court properly to                   
          determine whether the advance represented debt or equity, or                 
                                                               (continued...)          




Page:  Previous  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011