John William Barck & Janie R. Barck - Page 10




                                        - 9 -                                         
          Petitioner testified that he paid $6,000 in interest per year in            
          1994 and 1995, in monthly payments of $500 each.  However, he               
          only established that he made the monthly payments in February,             
          March, May, and July through December 1994, and January through             
          October 1995.  Petitioner repaid the principal in two payments of           
          $30,000 each, one in December 1996 and the other in October                 
          1997.3  Petitioners filed Schedules C, Profit or Loss From                  
          Business, for an unnamed business in 1994 and 1995.  In the                 
          notice of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioners                
          improperly reported income and claimed expenses on these                    
          Schedules C, and instead should have used Schedules E,                      
          Supplemental Income and Loss, because the income and expenses               
          were related to rental activities.4  Although significant                   
          deductions were allowed by respondent in connection with this               

          2(...continued)                                                             
          when the parties “introduced the issue at trial and acquiesced in           
          the introduction of evidence on that issue without objection.”).            
          3Nearly all the payments were in the form of checks drawn on                
          accounts in the name of Will or Janie Barck.  However, the                  
          payment made in May 1994 was drawn on an account in the name of             
          Barck, Inc.  Whether such a corporation actually existed is                 
          unclear from the record.  If it did not, this account was most              
          likely used by petitioner informally for individual business                
          purposes.  In any event, we accept petitioner’s testimony that he           
          intermingled funds between his accounts and that he used                    
          individual funds deposited into the Barck, Inc. account to make             
          the interest payment.                                                       
          4Petitioners also filed a Schedule C in 1993 for a business                 
          involved in “mobile home rent.”  It is unclear if this is the               
          same rental activity as that in which petitioners were engaged in           
          1994 and 1995.                                                              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011