Marvin L. Barmes and Barbara J. Barmes - Page 56




                                       - 56 -                                         
               On November 6, 1996, revenue agent Powell had a telephone              
          conversation with Mr. Barmes during which he advised Mr. Barmes             
          that he had completed an examination report with respect to                 
          petitioners’ 1994 and 1995 joint returns (examination report)               
          that contained certain adjustments which he had made to those               
          returns.  During that telephone conversation, revenue agent                 
          Powell asked Mr. Barmes whether Mr. Barmes intended to provide              
          any information or documentation to the IRS to refute those                 
          adjustments.  At no time did Mr. Barmes provide any information             
          or documentation to the IRS to refute or otherwise respond to the           
          adjustments contained in the examination report.                            
               On November 16, 1996, each petitioner executed an affidavit,           
          both of which respondent received on November 20, 1996.  Each of            
          those affidavits stated in pertinent part:                                  
               1.  *I am a “natural born free Citizen” adult                          
                    Constitutionally, aka USA National, of Indiana                    
                    Republic by birth, thus of America, and a                         
                    temporary inhabitant living in Knox County,                       
                    Indiana Republic; thankfully endowed by our                       
                    Creator God with Unalienable Rights partially                     
                    enumerated in America’s founding organic                          
                    documents, which I have never with knowingly                      
                    intelligent acts waived * * *                                     
               2.   Recent diligent studies have convinced me of the                  
                    above, and that as such I am not “subject to” the                 
                    territorially-limited “exclusive Legislation” and                 
                    its foreign jurisdiction mandated for Washington,                 
                    D.C. etc. * * *, including its “internal” govern-                 
                    ment organizations therein or by contract                         
                    adhesioned thereto across America.  And neither                   
                    are millions of other such Citizens, unless they                  
                    have provided “WAIVERS of Constitutional Rights”                  
                    with “knowingly intelligent act” (contracts with                  





Page:  Previous  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011