John Arthur & Patricia Mulholland Beecroft - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         
          personal planner) are for the most part filled with brief                   
          notations and numbers which give no indication of their business            
          nature, and to the extent that they show some business activity             
          they could just as easily be from petitioner’s primary employment           
          as from any outside business.  The receipts are for an assortment           
          of expenses, primarily travel and meals, which show no indication           
          that they were incurred for any business purpose.  No records               
          were provided showing purchases of product or inventory by                  
          petitioner, and no sales receipts were provided showing that any            
          actual sales had been made to customers.  In short, there is                
          nothing in the record which provides us with a basis for finding            
          that petitioner was engaged in a sales business.                            
               Petitioner testified that he subsidized his main employment            
          income with the sales business income in order to help support              
          himself and his family.  However, during the 7 years petitioner’s           
          business allegedly existed before and during the years in issue,            
          he claims to have incurred substantial losses in each year, and             
          in the years in issue to have had gross receipts of only $918,              
          $550, and $500.  We do not believe that petitioner would have for           
          years invested so much time and effort in an activity which                 
          yielded such poor results, and which provided his family with               
          negligible income even before expenses.                                     
               Petitioner argues that an IRS employee informed him in a               
          prior audit that his current method of maintaining records was              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011