George A. and Laurene S. Beitel - Page 9




                                        - 8 -                                         
          enrollment, or profit from excess enrollment, rested with the               
          universities; (3) petitioner began his relationship with the                
          universities in 1991, and he has continued to teach various                 
          courses related to his profession at both universities; and                 
          (4) each written contract expressly provides that petitioner                
          would be treated as an employee.                                            
               Accordingly, we find that petitioner was an employee of ISU            
          and UOI during 1997.  It follows that expenses related to his               
          teaching activities must be deducted as miscellaneous itemized              
          deductions.  See secs. 62(a)(1), 63(d), 67(a).  Respondent’s                
          determination in this regard is therefore sustained.                        
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   
               Based on the foregoing,                                                
                                                  Decision will be                    
                                             entered for respondent.                  




















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

Last modified: May 25, 2011