- 3 -3 Some of the facts in this case have been stipulated and are so found. Petitioner resided in Plymouth, Minnesota, at the time he filed his petition. During 1993, 1994, and 1995, petitioner worked as an accountant. During this time, petitioner resided at his family’s cabin in Clearwater, Minnesota. The cabin was located approximately 55 miles from his father’s office in Plymouth, Minnesota. Petitioner’s father was a Certified Public Accountant, with an accounting firm in Plymouth. Petitioner traveled to his father’s business office, 11425 Highway 55, Plymouth, Minnesota, approximately four times each week during the years in issue. Petitioner met with clients at his father’s office. Petitioner did not meet with clients at the cabin where he was living. Petitioner listed the Plymouth office address as his business address on the Schedules C for the years in issue. Petitioner became involved in a horse breeding/racing operation in the 1980s. Petitioner sold his final interest in the horse breeding/racing operation in 1995. Partnership returns for the horse breeding/racing operation were not filed for the 1993, 1994, and 1995 taxable years. Petitioner deducted net operating loss carryforwards from his horse breeding/racing operation in all 3 years. Respondent allowed the net operating loss carryforwards to the extent petitioner showed that he had a basis of $65,486, $47,255, andPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011