Andrew E. Blanche, Jr., and Cynthia D. Blanche - Page 31




                                       - 31 -                                         
          occupancy of the Foxbriar property after the expiration of the              
          earnest money contract and also during the time they believed               
          they were assuming the property.  Thus, the Court finds that                
          these moneys did not constitute a bona fide debt owed by the                
          Hewitts to petitioners.                                                     
               With respect to the $969 in plumbing repairs, petitioners              
          had a potential claim for reimbursement of these moneys in 1991.            
          This amount was included as a part of the $29,935.31 awarded to             
          petitioners in the 1997 District Court decision as restitution              
          for improvements and repairs made to the Foxbriar property.                 
          Thus, the $969, among other amounts, gave rise to a bona fide               
          debt owed to petitioners by the Hewitts (that was reduced to                
          judgment) in 1997 rather than in 1991.  There is insufficient               
          evidence in the record to determine whether or not this debt                
          became worthless and, if so, in what year.15  Also, as noted                
          earlier, the proceeds from the foreclosure sale were supposed to            
          have covered this item.  This Court is certain, however, that the           
          $969 was not a worthless debt in 1991 or 1992, and this Court’s             
          review of petitioners’ tax liability is limited to the years at             
          issue in this case.                                                         






               15   Vague assertions were made by petitioners that Mr.                
          Hewitt discharged this debt in bankruptcy; however, no indication           
          was given as to the year in which the debt was discharged, and no           
          documentary evidence was offered to prove the discharge.                    





Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011