- 31 - occupancy of the Foxbriar property after the expiration of the earnest money contract and also during the time they believed they were assuming the property. Thus, the Court finds that these moneys did not constitute a bona fide debt owed by the Hewitts to petitioners. With respect to the $969 in plumbing repairs, petitioners had a potential claim for reimbursement of these moneys in 1991. This amount was included as a part of the $29,935.31 awarded to petitioners in the 1997 District Court decision as restitution for improvements and repairs made to the Foxbriar property. Thus, the $969, among other amounts, gave rise to a bona fide debt owed to petitioners by the Hewitts (that was reduced to judgment) in 1997 rather than in 1991. There is insufficient evidence in the record to determine whether or not this debt became worthless and, if so, in what year.15 Also, as noted earlier, the proceeds from the foreclosure sale were supposed to have covered this item. This Court is certain, however, that the $969 was not a worthless debt in 1991 or 1992, and this Court’s review of petitioners’ tax liability is limited to the years at issue in this case. 15 Vague assertions were made by petitioners that Mr. Hewitt discharged this debt in bankruptcy; however, no indication was given as to the year in which the debt was discharged, and no documentary evidence was offered to prove the discharge.Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011