- 5 - annual salary.5 Neither the United States nor any of its individual agencies were contacted or made a part of the settlement process between Mr. Broedel and SUNY. In 1994, Mr. Broedel received two equal payments of $29,186.25 from SUNY as required by paragraph 2 of the consent award. The first payment was dated March 28, 1994, and the second payment was dated June 8, 1994. In February of 1995, Mr. Broedel received a Form 1099-MISC, Miscellaneous Income, from the State of New York reflecting nonemployee compensation for 1994 of $29,186.25. A dispute arose over whether Mr. Broedel was paid the proper amount under paragraph 2 of the settlement agreement. Mr. Broedel argued that the amount was supposed to be “tax free” and that the State of New York had improperly coded one of the two payments required under the settlement agreement, resulting in the issuance of a Form 1099-MISC to Mr. Broedel. On August 2, 1995, Mr. Babiskin issued a Supplemental Opinion and Award No. 2 which addressed this dispute.6 The relevant portions of the opinion provided: 5The parties agree that the amount of $58,372.50 represents one and one-half times Mr. Broedel’s annual salary. The form and taxability of the portion of the settlement award attributable to backpay and attendant benefits are not at issue. 6On Dec. 19, 1994, Mr. Babiskin issued a Supplemental Opinion and Award addressing an issue not relevant to this proceeding.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011