Kin Sang Chan - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
          returns.  The adjustments treated KSCI as a personal holding                
          company under section 542, and the proposed tax deficiencies for            
          KSCI were computed as if KSCI were a C corporation.  The proposed           
          increases in the tax liabilities of KSCI and the Chans totaled              
          more than $103,000, plus interest and penalties, and were                   
          primarily based on the premise that KSCI was a personal holding             
          company and not an S corporation.                                           
               On February 2, 1996, petitioner mailed a certified letter to           
          the IRS seeking an administrative appeal of the examination                 
          changes.  On March 21, 1996, the IRS transferred the Chans’ case            
          to its Appeals Office in Long Island, New York.  From February 2,           
          1996, until January 15, 1997, the IRS did not respond in writing            
          to the request by KSCI and the Chans for an Appeals Office review           
          of the adjustments proposed by Mr. Matos.                                   
               Petitioner and William J. Peter (Mr. Peter), the Appeals               
          Officer assigned to review the tax returns of KSCI and the Chans,           
          had a meeting scheduled for April 9, 1997.  The meeting, however,           
          was postponed because Mr. Peter was selected for jury duty.  On             
          July 24, 1997, Mr. Peter and petitioner held a conference to                
          discuss the proposed adjustments.                                           
               On July 29, 1997, Mr. Peter sent the Chans a letter and                
          enclosed agreement forms for them to sign reflecting the                    
          adjustments agreed upon during petitioner’s and Mr. Peter’s July            
          24 conference.  In the computations reflected in the Form 870-AD,           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011