Kin Sang Chan - Page 19




                                       - 19 -                                         
          information regarding KSCI be supplied on or before January 18,             
          1995.  It was not until April 27, 1995, that petitioner                     
          complied with Mr. Matos’s request for additional information.               
          Petitioner acknowledges that it was not until April 21, 1995,               
          that Mr. Matos began to review whether KSCI was a personal                  
          holding company.                                                            
               The record also indicates that Mr. Matos collected other               
          information from petitioner throughout the course of his                    
          examination.  Nothing in the record indicates that this                     
          information was related solely to the treatment of KSCI as a                
          personal holding company.  During his examination, Mr. Matos                
          made adjustments to KSCI’s income for omitted capital gain and              
          dividend income and disallowed certain KSCI expenses.  These                
          adjustments and disallowances were sustained at the                         
          administrative appeal level.  The information gathered during               
          the examination process enabled the Appeals officer to resolve              
          KSCI’s and the Chans’ 1992 and 1993 deficiency determinations               
          in a short time.                                                            
               For the period from October 20, 1997, when the IRS mailed              
          the Chans final Statements of Account and bills for examination             
          adjustments, to the present, any interest which accrued on                  
          petitioner’s tax deficiencies was solely due to petitioner’s                
          failure to pay his outstanding tax liabilities.  Petitioner’s               
          argument that he could have sold his Hong Kong stocks before                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011