- 7 -
for Jury Trial in Cause No. DV 96-60 (second amended complaint)
is dated February 12, 1997). Ms. Williams answered and made a
counterclaim (the answer and counterclaim). The second action is
styled “GAIL SUZANN CHEMODUREAU WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, vs. GEORGIA
DARIA HOHENSEE, CYNTHIA JAKUBEK, PAUL JAKUBEK, the heirs et al.,
Defendants”, Cause No. DV 96-109 (Cause No. DV 96-109). Cause
No. 96-109 was initiated by complaint filed April 1, 1996 (the
complaint). A cross-complaint (the cross-complaint) was brought
in Cause No. DV 96-109, styled “GEORGIA DARIA HOHENSEE,
Plaintiff, vs. GAIL SUZANN CHEMODUREAU, et al., Defendants.”
Cause No. DV 96-60 involves several causes of action based
upon agreements plaintiffs claim they entered into with decedent,
including an agreement entitled “LIVESTOCK AGREEMENT” (the
livestock agreement). Among the averments made by plaintiffs in
support of their causes of action are that (1) by the livestock
agreement, decedent had (A) leased the Abagail ranch to them and
(B) agreed to provide and maintain necessary equipment (i.e., the
ranch equipment) for ranch operations, and (2) Ms. Williams,
individually and as a personal representative of decedent’s
estate, had breached those agreements. Among the counts in
Ms. Williams’ counterclaim are counts alleging that plaintiffs
are unlawfully in possession of, and have refused to return to
Ms. Williams, the ranch equipment.
In Cause No. DV 96-109, Ms. Williams averred that she was
the sole owner of the Abagail ranch and sought to quiet her title
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011