Norman E. Duquette, Inc. - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
               C.  Discussion                                                         
                    1.  Validity of Notice                                            
               Petitioner claims that the notice is invalid because                   
          respondent failed to determine a deficiency in petitioner’s                 
          income tax or examine its return.                                           
               Section 6212(a) authorizes the Secretary to send a notice of           
          deficiency in respect of certain taxes, including the income tax.           
          We have jurisdiction to redetermine deficiencies determined by              
          the Secretary.  See sec. 6214(a).  A valid notice of deficiency             
          has been described as the “ticket to the Tax Court”.  E.g.,                 
          Baron v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 1028, 1034 (1979).  Petitioner               
          directs us to Scar v. Commissioner, 814 F.2d 1363 (9th Cir,                 
          1987), revg. 81 T.C. 855 (1983).  In Scar, the Court of Appeals             
          for the Ninth Circuit considered a notice of deficiency that, on            
          its face, revealed that no determination of a deficiency had been           
          made with respect to the taxpayers in question for the year in              
          question.  See id. at 1370.  The Court of Appeals held that such            
          a notice was invalid and the petition contesting such notice                
          should have been dismissed in the taxpayers’ favor for lack of              
          jurisdiction.  See id.  Commenting on Scar, we have held:  “Where           
          the notice of deficiency does not reveal on its face that the               
          Commissioner failed to make a determination, a presumption arises           
          that there was a deficiency determination.”  Campbell v.                    
          Commissioner, 90 T.C. 110, 113 (1988).                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011