Norman E. Duquette, Inc. - Page 22




                                       - 22 -                                         
                    2.  Sections 162(a)(2) and 274(d)(1)                              
               In pertinent part, section 162(a)(2) provides:                         
               There shall be allowed as a deduction [in computing                    
               taxable income] all the ordinary and necessary expenses                
               paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on                
               any trade or business, including--                                     
                    *    *    *         *  *      *    *                              
                    (2) traveling expenses (including amounts expended                
                    for meals and lodging other than amounts which are                
                    lavish or extravagant under the circumstances)                    
                    while away from home in the pursuit of a trade or                 
                    business * * *                                                    
               Section 274(d)(1) provides that no deduction shall be                  
          allowed pursuant to the provisions of section 162 for traveling             
          expenses, including meals and lodging, unless the taxpayer                  
          substantiates “by adequate records or by sufficient                         
          evidence corroborating the taxpayer’s own statement” the specific           
          time, place, and amount of the claimed expenditures, as well as             
          the business purpose of the expense.  Section 274(d)(1) is                  
          applicable to corporate as well as individual taxpayers.  See               
          Group Admin. Premium Serv., Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                
          1996-451; Rosenthal Chiropractic Offices, Inc. v. Commissioner,             
          T.C. Memo. 1993-331.                                                        
                    3.  Arguments of the Parties                                      
               Petitioner argues:  “In FY 94 [the 1994 tax year], the                 
          apartment was used for business for approximately 177 days.”                









Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011