- 3 - FINDINGS OF FACT Each set of petitioners, Patrick and Donna Elliott and Larry and Julia Elliott, respectively, was married and filed joint Federal income tax returns for each of the years under consideration. All petitioners resided in the State of Texas at the time their petitions were filed. Patrick and Larry, at all pertinent times, were employees, officers, and shareholders of American Energy Services, Inc. (AES). Patrick owned 30 percent of the AES stock, and he served as its vice president. Larry owned 29 percent of the AES stock and he served as its president. Patrick and Larry received Forms W–2, Wage and Tax Statement, showing wages from AES and reported the amounts as gross income (from wages) on page 1, line 7, of their Federal income tax returns. Patrick and Larry also received Forms 1099- MISC, Miscellaneous Income, reflecting additional amounts paid to them by AES. The Form 1099-MISC income was received from AES under its employee reimbursement plan for Patrick and Larry. AES’ reimbursements were made without review of the employee’s expenditures and provided for reimbursement of amounts up to $40,000 annually. AES did not have an “accountable plan” for reimbursement of travel and business expenses as that term is 2(...continued) Accordingly, if petitioners’ procedural attack is unsuccessful, they will not be entitled to deductions.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011