Patrick S. Elliott and Donna J. Elliott - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
               It is determined that the expenses claimed on your                     
               Forms 2106 in the amounts of * * *, including those                    
               claimed as miscellaneous itemized deductions, are                      
               disallowed because * * * [reason for disallowance].                    
               Petitioners argue that the above-quoted paragraphs would               
          have made it clear that the expenses claimed on the Forms 2106              
          were being disallowed.  We note that petitioners’ suggested                 
          explanation treats reporting the compensation on the Forms 2106             
          as the equivalent of including it in gross income.  We do not               
          agree with petitioners’ approach.  It is petitioners’ contention            
          that without the third paragraph the issue of the deductibility             
          of the expenses claimed on the Forms 2106 has not been subjected            
          to our jurisdiction.                                                        
               We must note that petitioners’ first recommended paragraph             
          addressing the reduction of income by the compensation reflected            
          on the Form 2106 is incorrect and/or unnecessary.  The                      
          compensation referred to in petitioners’ first paragraph had no             
          effect on petitioners’ taxable income because of the offset.  The           
          language used by respondent to increase gross income by the Form            
          1099-MISC compensation identified the source of the increase and            
          the variance from the method petitioners used to reflect the                
          income.  Certainly, respondent’s determination would have been              
          more explicit and thorough if it had contained some reference to            
          the expenses that petitioners had offset on their Forms 2106.               
          For example, the following language would have been helpful:                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011