- 14 - It is determined that the expenses claimed on your Forms 2106 in the amounts of * * *, including those claimed as miscellaneous itemized deductions, are disallowed because * * * [reason for disallowance]. Petitioners argue that the above-quoted paragraphs would have made it clear that the expenses claimed on the Forms 2106 were being disallowed. We note that petitioners’ suggested explanation treats reporting the compensation on the Forms 2106 as the equivalent of including it in gross income. We do not agree with petitioners’ approach. It is petitioners’ contention that without the third paragraph the issue of the deductibility of the expenses claimed on the Forms 2106 has not been subjected to our jurisdiction. We must note that petitioners’ first recommended paragraph addressing the reduction of income by the compensation reflected on the Form 2106 is incorrect and/or unnecessary. The compensation referred to in petitioners’ first paragraph had no effect on petitioners’ taxable income because of the offset. The language used by respondent to increase gross income by the Form 1099-MISC compensation identified the source of the increase and the variance from the method petitioners used to reflect the income. Certainly, respondent’s determination would have been more explicit and thorough if it had contained some reference to the expenses that petitioners had offset on their Forms 2106. For example, the following language would have been helpful:Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011