Roger F. and Carolyn R. Ellis - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined deficiencies of $2,435 and $3,545                
          in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for 1995 and 1996,                     
          respectively.  The issues for decision for each year in issue               
          are:  (1) Whether petitioners are entitled to various deductions            
          claimed on a Schedule C; and (2) whether petitioners are entitled           
          to a charitable contribution deduction greater than the amount              
          allowed by respondent.                                                      
          Background                                                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          Petitioners are husband and wife.  At the time the petition was             
          filed, they resided in Dayton, Ohio.  References to petitioner              
          are to Roger F. Ellis.1                                                     
               Petitioner holds undergraduate and graduate degrees in                 
          electrical engineering.  In 1989, at the age of 44, after 21                
          years of military service, petitioner retired from the United               
          States Air Force (USAF).  While in the USAF, petitioner was                 
          involved in the acquisition of missiles, aircraft, and, as he               
          testified at trial, “things of that type”.  His military                    
          assignments also included flight and systems tests.                         
               Shortly after retiring from the military, petitioner began             



               1 Carolyn R. Ellis neither signed the stipulation of facts             
          nor appeared at trial.  The case will be dismissed as to her for            
          lack of prosecution.  The decision to be entered with respect to            
          her will reflect the disposition of the issues considered in this           
          opinion, as well as those issues agreed upon by respondent and              
          petitioner.                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011